Which do you prefer in photo finishing your photos matte or glossy paper? is there an advantage of being glossy or vice versa? Which is more suited for framing photos? matte or glossy? please site your experiences in developing your photos.. Thanks!
I'm not a fan of matte, however, neither am I of glossy. I prefer the SEMI-gloss. It has the slight texturing that you would typically see with developed 35mm photo papers. Glossy paper tends to accumulate scratches on the surface in a heartbeat, plus it tends to stick to the glass in frames causing that "wet" appearance where it makes contact. Matte to me seems a bit too flat if you are wanting that photo-like look to it. Semi-gloss will pick up some fingerprints, but that is only if you like to just push your fingers all over it. Best thing to do is handle the photos by the sides or get lint-free gloves to handle all your printed work.
There is no real answer to this question, in my opinion. I believe the correct paper depends on the image itself. I've found that most of my monochrome images seem to look better printed matte, and, in fact, have used watercolor and velvet fine art paper with outstanding results. I actually never print on glossy--if an image isn't a candidate for matte, I use a luster finish (either Epson lustre or Ilford Smooth Pearl). I've framed images with different finishes, and, again, the best look is what fits the image. Not sure this helps, but it's my $.02 worth. I have one additional comment regarding KelleyJo's post above--although I never print on glossy, it sounds like you're not using a mat in your frames...otherwise your image wouldn't stick to the glass. It's never advisable to frame an image without a mat, regardless of the paper used.
I have actually matted some glossy photos and they still tended to stick to the glass a couple times. Not as bad, mind you, but the larger the photo, the more chance and room it had to stick. No big deal though, I fixed my problem by avoiding straight glossy papers. =)