B&W images should have detail in the blacks and clean whites with rich gray tones. It takes a properly exposed color digital file to make a good B&W. Underexposure or overexposure is somewhat easier to "fix" in a B&W but that is not an excuse for not getting it right from the git go.
Thanks Ben, I see what you mean! I should really buy a light meter to resolve the situation as 'guessing' and trial and error mean more work in lightroom later. The three shots you sent are really good and the level I am aiming to achieve; a bit more practice needed I think!
John
The old saying "practice makes perfect" is only partially right. If you practice and practice and don't get someone more qualified than yourself to point out the mistakes you are making, you will simply continue to make the same mistakes over and over again and never get better. Unfortunately the internet has made millions of GWC's overnight "experts" about everything photographic. I see them everyday on several photographic websites responding to underexposed, out of focus, poorly lit, badly composed images with comments like "wow", "excellent", "perfect", "wish I could shoot that well", etc., etc., ad nauseum.
Great works!
1st has a bit disturbing background, I think less DOF would correct it. the portrait itself is great. Lighting is superb! maybe I would make it a bit harder to accentuate that he's a man already, but he is still a teenager, so it's ok.
2nd is technically perfect! But it seems the model is strained, so does her smile.
3rd is simply perfect!!! =)